ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
A computer vision approach for the classification of multi liver tumor using computed tomography scan.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes the potential of computer vision (CV) approaches for liver tumor classification. Two-dimensional (2D) computed Tomography (CT) images dataset of benign and malignant liver tumors that were cholangiocarcinoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, hemangioma, hepatoblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma was acquired for this study. The CT dataset comprising 150 images, each sized at (512 × 512), encompassing various types of liver tumors. This dataset consisted of a total of 900 (150 × 6) CT images representing six benign and malignant liver tumor types. To enhance data quality, a Mean filter was applied for noise reduction, followed by the selection of two regions of interest (ROIs) from each liver image. Subsequently, the preprocessed data was subjected to feature extraction, resulting in 67 multi-features per image, incorporating histogram, spectral, and texture features. From these features, 21 optimized multi-features were derived through the implementation of a correlation-based feature selection (CFS) algorithm. These optimized multi-features formed the basis for analysis and were fed into six classifiers: multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression, random subspace, decision tree, produce error reduction, and multiclass classifier. The performance evaluation of these classifiers was conducted using 10-fold cross-validation techniques. The MLP showed a better accuracy of 97.67% on the optimized feature dataset among all the deployed CV classifiers. The experimental findings indicated that the suggested approach was systematic and resilient, offering valuable assistance to radiologists in detecting liver tumor diseases through CT Dataset images, even amid differing imaging standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.