ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
The tale of two assumptions: incorporating healthcare-seeking behaviour in epidemic forecasting.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModelling efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of incorporating human behaviour into mathematical models and the challenges of making accurate forecasts. Case detection is affected by different healthcare-seeking behaviors, including visiting physicians to seek help, which can impact the number of laboratory tests performed and the number of cases identified by surveillance systems throughout an epidemic. Mathematical models for forecasting epidemics of respiratory viruses such as influenza and COVID-19 generally assume a constant rate of case detection, and only a few studies have previously used time-dependent rates. PURPOSE: This study aims to compare constant and time-dependent case detection rate approaches for the forecast and retrospective fitting of seasonal influenza data.
methodsAn age-stratified Susceptible-Infected-Removed (SIR) model that incorporates case detection for influenza is formulated. Influenza case data and case detection rates for the 2016–2019 seasons in Alberta, Canada, are used for model training. The model fitting results are compared for the constant and time-dependent case detection assumptions. The model forecasting results using partial-season data are compared to the data for the remainder of the season for validation.
resultsWhile both constant and time-dependent case detection rate assumptions allowed an accurate retrospective fitting to the case data of an entire season, the forecasting performance showed a significant difference between the two assumptions. Models with a time-dependent case detection rate accurately predicted the influenza peak time four weeks before the actual peak occurred. The average total infections per case detected, an estimate that includes both under-ascertainment and underreporting, also showed a significant difference between the two assumptions.
conclusionThe incorporation of healthcare-seeking behaviour in mathematical modelling helps quantify the dynamic process of how infections are detected by surveillance systems. This is an important consideration for influenza forecasting. Since not all individuals engage in healthcare-seeking behaviour and only a fraction of those who do seek help may get tested, a proportion of infections remain undetected by the surveillance system. The retrospective forecasting results highlight that a time-dependent case detection rate is more representative of changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour during the influenza seasons than a constant case detection rate. This approach provides a reliable solution for improving forecasts of seasonal influenza and may be adaptable to other respiratory viral infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.