Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
The effect of continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous intravenous infusion of different doses of lidocaine on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
methodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study, elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University between January 2024 and February 2025 were enrolled. All patients received anterior quadratus lumborum block under ultrasound guidance combined with general anesthesia. Participants were randomized into three groups based on the lidocaine infusion dose after tracheal intubation: Group L (1.0 mg/kg/h), Group M (1.5 mg/kg/h), and Group H (2.0 mg/kg/h). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined time points. Secondary outcomes included patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) usage, postoperative opioid consumption, requirement of intraoperative ephedrine, Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores, and incidence of postoperative adverse events.
resultsA total of 114 patients aged ≥ 65 years (52 males and 62 females) were included with 38 cases in each group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable among the three groups. There were significant differences in postoperative pain NRS scores at 12-hour and 24-hour among three groups (both P < 0.001). Compared with the L group, the postoperative 12-hour and 24-hour pain NRS scores were significantly lower in both the M and H groups (P < 0.05) Compared to Group L, both Group M and Group H demonstrated significantly reduced cumulative PCA usage and postoperative opioid consumption (P < 0.05). Group H showed a higher requirement for intraoperative ephedrine compared to Groups L and M (P < 0.05). Upon entry into the post-anesthesia care unit, Groups L and M had significantly higher MOAA/S scores than Group H (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the incidence of adverse events among three groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionIn elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion at 2.0 mg/kg/h significantly reduced postoperative pain intensity at 12 and 24 h compared with 1.0 mg/kg/h. Based on these findings, the effective dosage range appears to be 1.5–2.0 mg/kg/h. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2500097315 (Retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.