ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Mixed methods realist evaluation of a co-designed intervention to promote shared decision-making with frail older adults, planning discharge from hospital: a protocol.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective planning for hospital discharge can best be achieved through shared decision-making (SDM): providing tailored, person-centred, strengths-based choice to allow for individuals to make fully informed decisions, with input from their relatives if they wish. Decisions such as care management, emergency planning and caregiver involvement. However, SDM is challenging for healthcare professionals and patients, particularly older people living with frailty. There is currently no consensus on the optimum way to achieve SDM, as the quality of evidence for interventions is minimal.
aimThis protocol outlines a project that aims to co-design a multi-component intervention to prepare health professionals, patients, and patients' carers to engage in SDM and to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the intervention using realist methods.
methodsThe research will be conducted in a health and social care trust in Northern Ireland with frail, older adults who are planning their discharge from hospital. The project will proceed in three stages. (1) Realist review of the literature will enable formulation of initial programme theory, including the impact of context and the identification of uncertainties. (2) Co-design of the intervention will ensure the inclusion of diverse stakeholders in the development of the intervention, with further development of the programme theory. (3) Implementation and feasibility testing of implementation processes, measurement of intervention costs, testing of outcome measures, and refinement of the programme theory. OUTCOMES: In line with MRC guidance for complex interventions we will seek insights to help refine the SDM intervention. The overall outcome evaluation will be guided by the 'Quintuple Aim' framework, which has five aims of seeking to advance health equity, enhance patient experience, improve health, reduce costs, and improve the work life of healthcare professionals. PROSPERO: (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) registration number CRD42024541455. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.