ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Incentivizing Prevention: Community Based Organizations' Perceptions on Financial Incentives for Recruitment and Retention of Participants in Keep it Up! (KIU!), an eHealth HIV Prevention Intervention.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03896776 (A Pragmatic Trial of Two Strategies for Implementing an Effective eHealth HIV Prevention Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pragmatic Trial of Two Strategies for Implementing an Effective eHealth HIV Prevention Program (Keep It Up! 3.0)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While financial incentivization has been found to significantly increase HIV retesting, receipt of HIV test results, and viral suppression, little research has examined community-based organizations (CBOs) perspectives on implementing financial incentives. We interviewed 22 CBOs related to implementing financial incentives for client engagement in a digital HIV prevention intervention, Keep It Up! (KIU!). KIU! was designed with and for young men who have sex with men (YMSM) who tested HIV-negative to maintain their negative status by reducing risk and enhancing protection. Most CBOs changed their incentive amounts and structures across two years of implementation to attempt to increase recruitment and retention. CBOs originally proposed a mean of $39 incentive in their applications for funding. One year later, the average incentive increased to $40, and then $68 the next year. Most CBO staff felt incentives may be effective in increasing recruitment, retention, and engagement. They highlighted the role of incentives in alleviating social determinants of health. Nearly a third of staff, though, felt the size of incentives may not be high enough. Further, these staff highlighted that incentives may be most helpful in recruiting participants but less beneficial for retention and engagement. Our analysis is among the first to examine CBO staff perceptions of implementing financial incentives for digital HIV prevention interventions in the U.S. Future research is needed to assess the effectiveness of financial incentivization of digital HIV prevention interventions and to identify the amount an incentive should be to increase recruitment and retention.Trial Registration: NCT03896776.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.