Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266904›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025

Suicide Risks Among U.S. College Students: a Time-Series Cross-Sectional Study Examining Institutional Characteristics and Behavioral Factors.

Li Deng, Chanam Lee, Sungmin Lee, Yizhen Ding, Galen Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li DengDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. lideng@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-4104
Chanam LeeDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sungmin LeeDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Yizhen DingDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Galen NewmanDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide has become the second leading cause of death among U.S. college students, exacerbated by COVID-19. A more comprehensive understanding of its risk factors can guide the development of effective prevention strategies tailored to this population. We employed a time-series cross-sectional approach and used the national survey data from the American College Health Association to examine the effects of institutional characteristics (school locale, region, size, and type) and behavioral factors (physical and social activities) on suicide risks among U.S. college students across different pandemic phases (before, early phase, and late phase). We also tested whether behavioral factors moderated the association between the pandemic period and suicide risk. After adjusting for confounders, multilevel regression results showed that (1) suicide risk increased during the pandemic, particularly in the late phase; (2) institutional characteristics, including geographic region and religious affiliation, as well as student behaviors such as physical and social activities, were significant predictors of suicide risks; and (3) behavioral factors moderated the pandemic's effect on suicide risk, as shown by the role of social activities (e.g., team sports, socializing with friends) amplifying the effect, whereas spending time with family mitigated it. Because risk rose fastest where certain social activities intensified pandemic effects, campuses should prioritize structured, lower-risk social engagement, while pairing selective strategies in high-activity settings (e.g., targeted screening, gatekeeper training) with universal measures (e.g., campus-wide suicide prevention program). Overall, this study offers evidence-informed guidance to shape campus environments that mitigate suicide risk and support student well-being, considering institutional context, behavioral factors, and public health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19StudentsSuicideAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2United StatesUniversitiesYoung AdultCollege studentsCOVID-19Institutional characteristicsPhysical activitySocial activitySuicidal behaviorSuicide prevention planning

Identifiers

PMID41266904
PMCPMC12804210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.