ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Ruxolitinib as second-line therapy for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the crucial manifestation of lung cGVHD. Ruxolitinib has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cGVHD treatment, but the response for BOS has not been sufficiently evaluated. We conducted a multicenter study involving 125 patients diagnosed with BOS post-HCT who received second-line therapies, including 77 patients treated with ruxolitinib (ruxolitinib group) and 48 patients with non-ruxolitinib therapies (control group). The primary endpoint was progression of BOS. By the third month, 18.2% of patients in the ruxolitinib group progressed, versus 43.8% in the control group (p = 0.001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 73.2% (95%CI 63.5%-84.5%) for the ruxolitinib group versus 60.2% (95%CI 47.4%-76.6%) for the control group (p = 0.012). The BOS-progression-free survival (BOS-PFS) was 69.0% (95%CI 59.1%-80.5%) versus 51.2% (95%CI 38.7%-67.7%, p = 0.011). Early switch to second-line therapy for BOS independently favored lower progression incidence (OR = 0.203, [95%CI 0.070-0.585], p = 0.003). Additionally, we observed that ruxolitinib was well-tolerated during the treatment of BOS. In conclusion, our findings indicated that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe second-line option for BOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.