ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Linking speech patterns to brain structure in affective and psychotic disorders: an integrative natural language processing approach.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural neuroimaging correlates of semantic incoherence in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language disturbances are central features of serious mental illnesses, yet traditional clinical assessments often rely on subjective evaluation that may overlook subtle speech anomalies. This study employs natural language processing (NLP) to objectively analyze spontaneous speech in a transdiagnostic sample comprising individuals with affective (n = 119 Major Depressive Disorder, n = 27 Bipolar Disorder) and psychotic disorders (n = 37 Schizoaffective Disorder, n = 11 Schizophrenia), as well as healthy controls (n = 178). Participants provided approximately 12 min of speech elicited via four pictures from the Thematic Apperception Test, which were transcribed and analyzed for semantic and syntactic features. Explorative factor analysis identified three latent linguistic dimensions: (1) Syntactic Complexity, (2) Lexical Diversity and Fluency, and (3) Narrow Thematic Focus. These dimensions were differentially associated with clinical ratings of formal thought disorder and neuroanatomical measures obtained through structural and diffusion-weighted MRI. Notably, Syntactic Complexity and Lexical Diversity correlated with decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) in frontotemporal white matter tracts, while Narrow Thematic Focus was linked to reduced gray matter volume in the right posterior insula. Importantly, these associations persisted after controlling for diagnosis, medication status, and verbal IQ. These findings suggest that NLP-derived speech metrics can serve as sensitive indicators for language dysfunction in psychiatric conditions, offering a scalable approach to elucidate brain-behavior relationships and advance models of psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.