ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic-assisted surgery in Egypt: national insights into awareness, knowledge, and perceptions among surgeons and patients.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is hindered by significant perception gaps among key stakeholders. This study evaluated the awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of RAS in Egypt to identify barriers to its adoption. A national, multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted across ten Egyptian university hospitals (Nov 2024-Apr 2025). Validated questionnaires were administered to three cohorts: general surgical patients (n = 539), surgeons (n = 486), and RAS-experienced patients (n = 32). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of patient preference and surgeon support for RAS. A stark perception gap was observed. Surgeon awareness was high (90.7%), but knowledge was limited; only 56.8% knew RAS was available in Egypt. Despite this, 80.0% supported national implementation, which was independently predicted by awareness of local availability (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 3.25-12.42) and correct technical understanding (aOR 2.49, 1.48-4.18). Conversely, patient awareness was low (30.4%), with high prevalence of fears regarding malfunction (63.3%). Only 20.0% preferred RAS. Patient preference was associated with the absence of fears (aOR 0.08, 0.04-0.16) and belief in improved outcomes (aOR 4.08, 2.10-7.94). RAS-experienced patients, informed primarily by surgeons (90.6%), reported high satisfaction (84.4% "Very Good"/"Excellent") and were strong advocates (90.6% would recommend it). RAS adoption in Egypt appears to be influenced mainly by modifiable perceptual barriers rather than demographics. Surgeons are generally supportive but under-informed, while patient hesitancy seems driven by fear that can lessen after direct exposure and education. National strategies should prioritize targeted education and the use of positive patient experiences to help address these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.