ArticleScientific reports2025
Secure and scalable dual blockchain and IPFS driven IoT ecosystem for next gen healthcare systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blockchain-enabled data management system of internet of medical things.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Privacy preservation of EHR by data anonymization and federated learning for IoT based smart city application in healthcare.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A blockchain-enabled scalable and secure architecture for cloud big data storage using sharding and swarming.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-collecting Internet of Things (IoT) gadgets have transformed healthcare systems. Centralising IoT healthcare data processing and storage introduces scalability, speed, security, and privacy issues. On the other hand, Blockchain technology attracts interest in the IoT healthcare industries because of its decentralisation, data protection, transparency, and security aspects. Single public blockchain ledgers are inefficient for healthcare IoT security and efficiency due to high transaction fees, limited scalability, and high patient traffic. Specifically, this article focuses on the concerns around privacy, security, performance, scalability, and energy consumption in healthcare blockchain-IoT systems. In this paper, we propose CareChain, an IPFS storage system with two blockchains, one for patients and the other for healthcare providers, to manage healthcare IoT data. The proposed model uses IPFS distributed storage to improve system throughput, reducing transaction latency and blockchain storage overhead. It improves storage requirements, energy efficiency, transaction speed, privacy, and security. It envisions a system-wide data and information security architecture that uses the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and a device proxy to keep tabs on low-cost devices. The prototype model was tested to investigate its security, efficiency, and energy use. The results show that this system is more robust than the existing healthcare models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.