Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266781›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Uncovering the connection: ethylene exposure and endogenous ethylene oxide levels in humans.

Yu-Sheng Lin, Kristina A Thayer, Paul White, Viktor Morozov, Amanda S Persad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Regarding ethylene exposure and endogenous ethylene oxide levels in humans (Lin et al., 2025).Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Sheng LinOffice of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Lin.Yu-Sheng@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6813-7826
Kristina A ThayerOffice of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.
Paul WhiteOffice of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Viktor MorozovOffice of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Amanda S PersadOffice of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthylene oxide (EtO) is a known carcinogen, with general population exposure primarily from air pollution and smoking. EtO can also form internally via ethylene (ET) oxidation, which originates from both environmental sources and endogenous processes like lipid peroxidation. This has raised questions about ET exposure as a primary source of endogenous EtO, though quantitative evidence remains limited.

objectiveTo investigate the impact of total ET exposure-external and internal-on endogenous EtO in non-smoking and non-occupational populations ("non-exposed").

methodsLiterature and pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted to assess the evidence on ET exposure and associated EtO levels. Since most ET is exhaled unmetabolized, breath analysis provides the best estimate of total ET exposure. Two pharmacokinetic approaches were utilized to link ET exposure and EtO body burden. Circulating EtO was evaluated by its hemoglobin adducts, [N-(2-hydroxyethyl)valine or HEV], a method commonly applied in high-exposure contexts, but its application is less certain for background exposure.

resultsThe literature review indicated that exhaled ET concentrations varied among identified studies with a median of 12 ppb (range: 0.2-740 ppb). Across studies of purified air conditions, exhaled ET concentrations were lower (0.2-1.2 ppb), suggesting limited internal ET contribution. In an ET- and EtO-free environment, the pharmacokinetic models predict that <1-2 ppb exhaled ET can arise from internal ET sources in 70-kg adults. With a nominal ambient ET exposure (15 ppb), predicted exhaled ET reaches 16 ppb, aligned with the literature. In the same exposure conditions, less than 3.5 pmol HEV/g globin-under 20% of background HEV (approximately 20 pmol/g globin) observed in non-exposed populations-can be attributed to ET-derived EtO, suggesting unidentified HEV sources. SIGNIFICANCE: This analysis shows that endogenous EtO arising from ET exposures appears much lower than previously suggested in "non-exposed" populations. Given EtO's carcinogenic potential, further research, including methodology enhancement, is warranted. IMPACT: This innovative study is the first to integrate a literature review, pharmacokinetic modeling, and biomarker analysis to examine the relationship between ethylene (ET) exposure and endogenous ethylene oxide (EtO), a known human carcinogen. Our findings contribute valuable insights to improve risk assessment and advance scientific understanding of EtO exposure.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureEthylene OxideEthylenesBiomarkersBreath TestsHumansAir PollutantsBiomarkersethyleneEthylene OxideEthylenes

Identifiers

PMID41266781
PMCPMC13169377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.