ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of curing effect of bulk curing barns with different types of biomass combustion equipment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the deteriorating global environment, the increasing demand for energy sources, humanity urgently need to explore clean and renewable energy to replace coal fuel resources in the field of tobacco curing. Biomass, a more environment-friendly energy source, is widely used but shows inconsistent results for many types of biomass combustion equipment in China. To provide basis for the clean curing, quality enhancement and curing efficiency improvement of tobacco leaves, the effect of five different types of biomass combustion equipment bulk curing barn (T1, a built-in biomass bulk curing barn with a special hearth for burning through a smoke pipe; T2, an external biomass bulk curing barn with a flame pipe through a smoke pipe; T3, a biomass semi-gasification combustion heating furnace bulk curing barn with a built-in hearth; T4, a type I built-in biomass bulk curing barn with integrated heat supply and heat exchange; T5, a type II built-in biomass bulk curing barn with integrated heat supply and heat exchange) on curing performance, biomass combustion efficiency, pollutant emissions, curing cost, economic characters, chemical composition content, aroma substance content and sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves were compared and analyzed. Our results showed that the curing effect of the T4 and T5 treatments was better, the T2 treatment was worse, while the other treatments were moderate. In our data, the T4 and T5 treatments exhibited good curing temperature -rise performance and stable temperature performance with smaller temperature deviations. In addition, the T4 and T5 treatments resulted in lower curing costs, exhibited better economic characteristics, achieved more favorable coordination of chemical composition, offered superior sensory quality, and had a higher content of aroma substances in the flue-cured tobacco leaves compared to the other treatments. The curing effect of the built-in biomass bulk curing barn with integrated heating and heat exchange is superior, providing an important basis for the current low-carbon clean energy curing practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.