Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of glyphosate and Roundup Quickpro on Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Tasnimul Ferdous, Qingfang He, Wen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tasnimul FerdousDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Qingfang HeDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR, 72204, USA.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA. wenzhang@uark.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glyphosate and Roundup products have become the most used herbicide worldwide. However, previous bans in Europe and recent reversal have caused confusion over their safety. This study aims to investigate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of Roundup QuickPro and its main ingredient glyphosate using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Cytotoxicity was calculated by measuring CHO cell viability with 72 h of exposure to each toxicant. Roundup QuickPro exhibited higher cytotoxicity with LC50 of 511.2 µg/mL than glyphosate's LC50 of 3389 µg/mL. The recommended application concentration (11,233.7 µg/mL) of Roundup QuickPro is much higher than the measured LC50, which caused complete cell death in the cytotoxicity assay. Genotoxicity was measured using the Comet assay that can assess DNA damage in individual CHO cells. Like cytotoxicity, genotoxicity also exhibited a similar trend showing Roundup QuickPro causing more DNA damage than glyphosate. This enhanced toxicity observed in Roundup QuickPro may be attributed to the presence of diquate dibromide and other ingredients used in its formulation. The results from this study could help guide future in vivo toxicity research of glyphosate and Roundup products, and further improve the policy to protect the environment and human health against herbicide use.

Indexed as

GlycineHerbicidesAnimalsCell SurvivalCHO CellsComet AssayCricetinaeCricetulusDNA DamageGlyphosateGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesCHO assaysComet assayCytotoxicityHerbicideLC50

Identifiers

PMID41266750
PMCPMC12634689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.