Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266735›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dangling centrality highlights critical nodes by evaluating network stability through link removal.

Ubaida Fatima, Saman Hina, Muhammad Wasif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ubaida FatimaDepartment of Mathematics, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan. ubaida@neduet.edu.pk.
Saman HinaDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Muhammad WasifVelocityX, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces "Dangling Centrality," a novel metric for identifying critical nodes in networks by assessing the impact of their link removal on system dynamics. The proposed metric is validated on real-world datasets, including Amazon product networks, a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, and a Bitcoin network, offering insights into key products, critical proteins, and influential entities. These nodes, as the main pillars of system propagation, are crucial for maintaining the structural and functional integrity of the network. By removing the links of these nodes, the network's stability, flow, and communication can be disrupted, highlighting their importance. Additionally, small-scale 5-node and 6-node networks are analyzed to demonstrate the metric's behavior in simpler contexts. Correlation analyses using Pearson's, Spearman's, and Kendall's coefficients demonstrate alignment with traditional centrality metrics while providing a unique perspective. The findings emphasize the metric's practical utility in understanding network vulnerabilities, enhancing resilience, and informing system design. Materials and implementations are available at: https://github.com/Ubaidafatima/Centrality-Measures .

Indexed as

Bitcoin datasetCentrality metricsDangling centrality metricProtein–protein interaction networkSocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID41266735
PMCPMC12635058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.