ArticleScientific reports2025
Dangling centrality highlights critical nodes by evaluating network stability through link removal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted spreader identification via lexicographic core decomposition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A machine learning framework for structural and predictive analysis of intelligent data networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heuristic centrality methods challenge greedy optimization in influence maximization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces "Dangling Centrality," a novel metric for identifying critical nodes in networks by assessing the impact of their link removal on system dynamics. The proposed metric is validated on real-world datasets, including Amazon product networks, a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, and a Bitcoin network, offering insights into key products, critical proteins, and influential entities. These nodes, as the main pillars of system propagation, are crucial for maintaining the structural and functional integrity of the network. By removing the links of these nodes, the network's stability, flow, and communication can be disrupted, highlighting their importance. Additionally, small-scale 5-node and 6-node networks are analyzed to demonstrate the metric's behavior in simpler contexts. Correlation analyses using Pearson's, Spearman's, and Kendall's coefficients demonstrate alignment with traditional centrality metrics while providing a unique perspective. The findings emphasize the metric's practical utility in understanding network vulnerabilities, enhancing resilience, and informing system design. Materials and implementations are available at: https://github.com/Ubaidafatima/Centrality-Measures .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.