ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and discordant findings on exercise stress echocardiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExercise stress echocardiography (ExE) includes assessment of regional wall motion and EKG changes and, not uncommonly, discordant results are observed. Though stress induced wall motion abnormalities are widely considered positive for presence of ischemia, EKG-only positive studies are dismissed as equivocal/false positive, in which case, further evaluation is appropriate.
methodsPatients who had undergone a clinically indicated ExE and subsequent coronary CT angiogram (CCTA) within one month were identified. They were categorized based on the discordant results of the echocardiographic and electrocardiographic components of the study (EKG+/ECHO-, EKG-/ECHO+). The CCTA results were classified using CAD-RADS 2.0. CT fractional flow assessment was performed for 30-90% stenosis lesions.
results197 patients with discordant ExE results were identified (EKG+/ECHO- n = 159, EKG-/ECHO + n = 38). 35.2% of the EKG+/ECHO- group were classified as CAD-RADS 3 or greater (28.9% left anterior descending, 12.6% left circumflex, and 15.1% right coronary artery moderate/severe stenoses). Of the EKG-/ECHO + patients, 23.7% were classified as CAD RADS 3 or greater (15.8% left anterior descending, 5.3% left circumflex, and 10.5% right coronary artery moderate/severe stenoses). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in the overall degree of coronary artery disease.
conclusionsDiscordant ExE results with ST segment depressions during exercise without regional wall motion abnormalities (EKG+/ECHO-) and discordant ExE results without ST segment changes with stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities (EKG-/ECHO+) are both associated with a clinically relevant burden of coronary artery disease, without a statistically significant difference in the degree or severity between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41266719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.