ArticleScientific reports2025
Urban-rural differences in influencing factors of depressive symptoms among Chinese perimenopausal women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perimenopause is a high-risk period for depressive symptoms in women. Investigating the urban-rural differences in key factors associated with depressive symptoms among Chinese perimenopausal women can provide a scientific basis for developing targeted intervention strategies. Using data from the 2020 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we employed a random forest model combined with Shapley value decomposition (a cooperative-game-theoretic approach that quantifies each variable's marginal contribution to model accuracy), supplemented by logistic regression analysis, to systematically explore urban-rural differences in key factors influencing depressive symptoms in perimenopausal women. Among 1,105 perimenopausal women, the overall prevalence of depressive symptoms was 39.3%, with 34.4% in urban areas and 42.4% in rural areas. Life satisfaction, self-rated health, and sleep duration emerged as common factors affecting depressive symptoms in both urban and rural perimenopausal women. Chronic disease, hospitalization history, children's financial support, and child contact were unique key factors influencing depressive symptoms in urban women. In contrast, activities of daily living (ADL), cognitive function, and total annual household income were unique key factors influencing depressive symptoms in rural women. Significant urban-rural differences exist in the key factors associated with depressive symptoms among Chinese perimenopausal women. Policy makers should therefore design context-specific mental-health programmes. for example, urban initiatives could integrate chronic-disease management with family-based psychosocial support, whereas rural programmes might combine economic-security improvements with community-level cognitive-health screening and rehabilitation of activities of daily living-to maximise intervention effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.