Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Digital twin for the analog scoliometer: advancements in telehealth for paediatric spine deformity care.

Sinduja Suresh, Annabelle Stubbs, Grace Pulling, Amir Amiri, Maree Therese Izatt, Robert David Labrom, Geoffrey Noel Askin, Judith Paige Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sinduja SureshBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. s.suresh@qut.edu.au.
Annabelle StubbsBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Grace PullingBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Amir AmiriOrthopaedics Department, Queensland Children's Hospital (QCH), Brisbane, Australia.
Maree Therese IzattBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Robert David LabromBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Geoffrey Noel AskinBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Judith Paige LittleBiomechanics and Spine Research Group (BSRG), Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In scoliosis care, a spine specialist will measure the lateral curvature of the spine from a radiograph and measure the torso rotation non-radiographically with an analog scoliometer directly on the patient at every surveillance appointment. While radiographs can be taken at any imaging centre and transferred to the treating spine clinic, the patient must visit in-person for monitoring the progression of structural rotation. Until now, distance measurement of the Angle of Trunk Rotation (ATR) has not been possible as no "virtual" scoliometer exists. This study describes the development of the first digital twin for the analog scoliometer to enable fast, gravity-independent, reliable and accurate digital ATR measurements from patient-specific 3D virtual models. It mimics the physical measurement process of the ATR using an analog scoliometer in a virtual environment. Validation of the tool showed excellent intra-user (< 0.95) and inter-user (< 0.95) reliability. The digital measurements had a high positive correlation (0.897) and agreement (92.7%) with the analog measurements made clinically. At 6° cut-off, the tool showed a high sensitivity of 90.24% and specificity of 92.31%. Larger device width was not shown to be an advantage. The development of this digital twin is significant for telehealth implementation in paediatric spine deformity management.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpineTelemedicineAdolescentChildFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleRadiographyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41266674
PMCPMC12635397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.