Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Configurational impact of motivational factors on postdoctoral job satisfaction.

Xiaoyi Bing, Xinjue Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoyi BingSchool of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Xinjue WanSchool of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China. tarawan1988@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postdoctoral researchers play a critical role in advancing global science, yet widespread job dissatisfaction threatens both their retention and research productivity. Although prior studies have identified discrete factors affecting postdoctoral job satisfaction, the complex, configurational relationships among them remain poorly understood. To bridge this gap, our study draws on Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory and employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to explore how different configurations of key motivational factors jointly shape postdoctoral job satisfaction. Analyzing data from the 2023 Nature Global Postdoctoral Survey, we identified eight distinct configurational pathways-five associated with high satisfaction and three with low. These findings provide actionable evidence for institutions to tailor support strategies that better serve postdoctoral needs.

Indexed as

fsQCAJob satisfactionMotivational factorsPostdoctoral researchers

Identifiers

PMID41266672
PMCPMC12635147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.