ArticleScientific reports2025
Embedding-driven dual-branch approach for accurate breast tumor cellularity classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A lightweight ResNet50V2-ECA model for renal cell carcinoma grading: efficiency, calibration, and state-of-the-art performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a dual-branch framework for precise classification of breast tumor cellularity via histopathological images where it integrates two distinct branches: the Embedding Extraction Branch (embedding-driven) and the Vision Classification Branch (vision-based). The Embedding Extraction Branch uses the Virchow2 transformation to generate dense, structured embeddings, whereas the Vision Classification Branch employs Nomic AI Embedded Vision v1.5 to process image patches and produce classification logits. Both branches' outputs are combined to form the final classification. The framework also suggests Knowledge Block with fully connected layers, batch normalization, and dropout to improve feature extraction and reduce overfitting. The proposed approach reports high performance metrics, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text], specificity of [Formula: see text], and sensitivity, precision, and F1 score of [Formula: see text]. Also, ablation studies show the mandatory role of the embedding extraction branch; as its removal drastically reduces accuracy to [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, the Vision Classification Branch contributes significantly and its removal aims to a smaller decrease in the accuracy performance ([Formula: see text]). Additionally, data augmentation improves model performance and its exclusion results in a notable decline in accuracy performance ([Formula: see text]). The approach's robustness is validated through statistical analysis that reports low variance and high consistency across multiple performance metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.