Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266635›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Investigating White Americans' Mental Images of Who Has Abortions and Its Impact on Attitudes Toward Abortion Policies.

Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi, Erin Cooley, Sarah Espinel, Jaclyn A Lisnek, William Cipolli, Sara I McClelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jazmin L Brown-IannuzziUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. jb3jd@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-8385
Erin CooleyColgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA. cooley@colgate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-1196
Sarah EspinelCornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jaclyn A LisnekStanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
William CipolliColgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA.
Sara I McClellandUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling to eliminate the federal right to abortion (the "Dobbs decision"), a new landscape of highly variable abortion policies emerged across the U.S. Given that individuals' attitudes toward those who have abortions wield significant power in shaping abortion policies, it is critical to understand the factors which underly these attitudes toward those who have abortions. The current work investigated whether White Americans' attitudes toward abortion may be related to their mental representations of those who have abortions, with implications for restrictive abortion policy support. Across three pre-registered online study sets (N = 2414) and one nationally representative sample (N = 452), the findings suggest that White Americans' mental representations of those who have abortions are suffused with racial and gender bias, particularly when imagining those who have abortions for non-medical reasons, and these visualizations impact abortion policy attitudes.

Identifiers

PMID41266635
PMCPMC12635111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.