Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266626›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Causal Networks to Inform Decisions for Ecological Restoration.

Christopher J Kotalik, Freya E Rowland, Bruce G Marcot, Kristin E Skrabis, David M Walters, Jo Ellen Hinck, William H Clements, Eric E Richer, John P Isanhart

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher J KotalikU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, MO, USA. ckotalik@usgs.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-6036
Freya E RowlandU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-5301
Bruce G MarcotU.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-7481
Kristin E SkrabisU.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Policy Analysis, Washington, DC, USA.
David M WaltersU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-2158
Jo Ellen HinckU.S. Geological Survey, Natural Hazards Mission Area, Reston, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-5766
William H ClementsDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-1970
Eric E RicherAquatic Research Section, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-7995
John P IsanhartU.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Restoration and Damage Assessment, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-1839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of contaminants into the environment can occur from anthropogenic activities, such as oil extraction and transportation, mining, and industrial processes. Remediation associated with reducing contaminant concentrations, and restoration that improves animals and supporting habitat, are often needed to restore ecosystems to their pre-release, baseline condition. We demonstrated the application of Bayesian Decision Networks (BDNs) with two Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) case studies. We use a stylized case study of riparian restoration following the remediation of a mine-impacted site to evaluate proposed restoration actions aimed at restoring Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) populations to baseline conditions. We then use a settled NRDAR case with implemented restoration in the Upper Arkansas River (UAR, Colorado, USA) to demonstrate the application of BDNs to evaluate and forecast restoration effectiveness for Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) (i.e., restoration effectiveness assessment). The riparian restoration model showed differences in the effects of restoration actions on Song Sparrow populations, with the time to reach baseline generally reduced with increased restoration costs, indicating trade-offs between costs and expected recovery. The UAR model showed recovery of Brown Trout populations (i.e., uplift) in response to improved instream habitat restoration, along with forecasted improvements. While the BDNs we developed were specific to two case studies, the structure is adaptable to a diversity of sites, resources, and actions. We suggest that causal network modeling can provide restoration practitioners with a decision advisory tool useful for a wide range of projects.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationAnimalsBayes TheoremColoradoMiningRiversTroutCausal networkDecision advisory toolHabitat restorationNatural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration

Identifiers

PMID41266626
PMCPMC12995969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.