ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of steel slag as fine aggregate on the mechanical and durability performance of concrete under acid exposure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microstructural enhancement of concrete paver blocks using steel sludge as a sustainable fine aggregate replacement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study on the Effects of Steel Slag on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Cement-Stabilised Base Course Mixtures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable construction materials has driven research into alternative aggregates to reduce reliance on natural resources. This study comprehensively evaluates the mechanical and durability properties of concrete incorporating steel slag as a partial replacement for fine aggregates at replacement levels of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. An extensive experimental program was conducted to evaluate compressive, tensile, flexural, and shear strengths, as well as acid resistance and microstructural stability using XRD. The results show that a 50% slag replacement achieved optimal mechanical performance, with the highest compressive and flexural strengths, improved tensile capacity, and superior shear resistance. Specifically, the 50% slag mix demonstrated a 7.9% increase in flexural strength (from 1090.7 psi to 1164.3 psi), maintaining over 82% of the compressive strength of the control at 28 days. The 25% and 75% mixes also demonstrated balanced strength and ductility characteristics. XRD analysis showed that slag-blended concretes retained key hydration products such as Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and Quartz after exposure to sulfuric acid, indicating improved chemical resistance. A newly proposed durability index, integrating both mass loss and strength retention, was used to quantify durability performance, with the 50% mix exhibiting a durability index DI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.