Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266590›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Individual differences in how infants change behaviours from spontaneous to instrumental.

Ryo Fujihira, Hama Watanabe, Gentaro Taga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryo FujihiraGraduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. fujihira@p.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5311-9087
Hama WatanabeGraduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Gentaro TagaGraduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young infants can change their behaviour and learn through interactions with novel environments. This ability has been demonstrated through group-averaged analyses. However, it remains unclear whether averaged behavioural changes accurately capture the diverse changes occurring at the individual level. To address this, we measured limb movement alterations in 185 infants aged 2 to 3 months before and after their arm was tethered to an overhead mobile and analysed individual differences in addition to conventional group analyses. While the group-averaged data showed a gradual increase in arm movements, individual learning curves rarely exhibited such simple gradual increases and instead displayed more complex patterns. To disentangle the complex movement patterns, we applied time-series clustering and dynamical systems modelling to our large-scale dataset. As a result, the infants were divided into distinct clusters with significant differences in spontaneous movements before learning, rather than after. A dynamical systems model further demonstrated that only differences in spontaneous movements could explain the diversity of overall behavioural changes. These findings indicate that the varying degrees of behavioural change reflect infants' unique learning processes rather than their learning capabilities. Furthermore, learning, as a process that reduces individual difference, suggest that infants harness their unique spontaneous movements to acquire instrumental behaviours.

Identifiers

PMID41266590
PMCPMC12635129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.