ArticleScientific reports2025
Butyric, lactic, and propionic acids with their salts as natural growth promoters in broilers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of Saccharomyces, Bacillus, and Lactobacillus as antibiotic alternatives on growth performance, redox balance, and gut microbiota in broilers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dietary Acidifier Modulates the Gut Microbiota-Metabolic Axis to Improve Intestinal Health, Yolk Fatty Acid Profiles, and Egg Quality in Laying Hens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of Functional Feed Additives and Lower Antibiotic Use on Poultry Meat Quality and Consumer Perception.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the effects of lactic, propionic and butyric acids, along with their salts, as natural antibiotic alternatives and growth promoters in broiler diets. Three hundred one-day-old Cobb broiler chicks (n = 60 per group), with six replicates of 10 birds each, were randomly allocated to five dietary treatments for 35 days: T1 (control, basal diet); T2 (basal diet + lactic acid and lactate, 0.5 g/kg each); T3 (basal diet + propionic acid and propionate, 0.5 g/kg each); T4 (basal diet + butyric acid and butyrate, 0.5 g/kg each); and T5 (basal diet + a mixture of lactic, propionic, and butyric acids and their salts, 0.17 g/kg each; total ≈ 1 g/kg). Growth performance, blood biochemistry, antioxidant indicators, thyroid hormones, carcass characteristics, intestinal microbiota, and humoral immune responses were assessed. The findings indicate that the blend of organic acids and their salts significantly improved (p ≤ 0.05) productive performance during the grower, finisher, and overall periods. Serum antioxidant indices (TAC, CAT) and RBC enzymatic activities (SOD, CAT) exhibited significant increases (p ≤ 0.05), whereas MDA levels were significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.05). T4 hormone levels increased (p ≤ 0.05) in the treated groups without affecting liver and kidney functions. The intestinal microbiota exhibited elevated (p ≤ 0.05) Lactobacillus levels and inhibited E. coli proliferation. Humoral immunity exhibited significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) HI titers against avian influenza viruses (H9 and H5) than the control group. Overall, supplementation with organic acids and their salts offers a suitable natural growth promoter that enhances broiler productive performance, immunity, and antioxidant status without adversely affecting physiological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.