ArticleScientific reports2025
Standard deviation of pulse pressure measured using wearable devices improves the estimation of acute psychological stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent technical innovations have increased the use of physiological information as objective indices for stress measurement. Early detection of acute stress can minimize long-term stress burdens by aiding in the prevention and treatment of stress-related physical and mental health problems. The standard deviation of pulse pressure (SDPP) has recently emerged as an objective index for measuring stress. However, the causal relationship between acute stress and SDPP has not been verified, and it is unclear whether SDPP can detect stress responses that conventional indices cannot. This study investigated whether SDPP, measured using a wearable device, can be used as a stress assessment index to detect acute psychological stress and improve the accuracy of stress estimation in healthy participants who were subjected to the trier social stress test (TSST). A total of 114 healthy volunteers were randomly divided into the stress- induced (Stressed) and non-stress (Control) groups. Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), which are indices of the autonomic nervous system, and salivary cortisol, an endocrine marker, were used as objective stress indices. Psychological evaluations (POMS2, STAI) were employed as subjective assessments. The relationships between these measurements and SDPP were evaluated. The results indicated that SDPP was significantly higher in the Stressed group, confirming that SDPP reflects induced stress. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that adding SDPP to HR, HRV, and cortisol can improve the accuracy of estimating stress presence. Moreover, a multilevel analysis revealed that SDPP can enhance the estimation of psychological evaluation (POMS [total mood disturbance]) scores. The results suggest that SDPP can estimate the degree of stress experienced by an individual and monitor stress responses undetectable by conventional indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.