ArticleScientific reports2025
Effectiveness of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against medically attended pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection among older adults: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been recommended for more than a decade for older adults and individuals with chronic medical or immunocompromising conditions. However, real-world evidence on its vaccine effectiveness (VE) in this population especially Low- or Middle-Income Country (LMIC) is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the VE of PCV13 against pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) among older and high-risk adults.The study was a case-control design using data from a tertiary, university-affiliated hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2024. Adults aged ≥ 60 years with medically attended LRTI were included. Cases were defined as culture-confirmed pneumococcal LRTI. Controls were patients with LRTI in whom Streptococcus pneumoniae was not isolated, identified via ICD-10 codes. VE was estimated using logistic regression, comparing odds of PCV13 vaccination between cases and controls. Among 825 patients with LRTI, 39 (4.7%) had received PCV13 and 786 (95.3%) were unvaccinated. The crude VE of PCV13 against pneumococcal LRTI was 71.9% (95% CI: 27.3-89.1), and the adjusted VE was 73.3% (95% CI: 9.0-92.1). The requirement for mechanical ventilation at admission decreased among PCV13-vaccinated patients compared with unvaccinated patients with pneumococcal LRTI. VE appeared comparable among individuals aged ≥ 75 years compared to those < 75 years. In a sensitivity analysis restricted to controls with non-pneumococcal bacterial LRTI, the crude VE increased to 76.1% (95% CI: 34.3-91.3).PCV13 demonstrated real-world effectiveness in preventing medically attended pneumococcal LRTI among older adults. The public health benefit of PCV13 in older adults in LMICs was clearly demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.