Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266514›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Natural language processing techniques to detect delirium in hospitalized patients from clinical notes: a systematic review.

Ravi Shankar, Janani Kannan, Yih Hng Tan, Qian Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ravi ShankarMedical Affairs - Research Innovation & Enterprise, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. ravisr.srivastava@gmail.com.
Janani KannanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yih Hng TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Qian XuSchool of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delirium affects 50% of hospitalized older adults and 80% of ICU patients, yet detection rates are as low as 20-30% with traditional methods. Natural language processing (NLP) offers potential for automated detection from clinical notes. We systematically reviewed NLP techniques, searching eight databases through March 2025. From 912 records, 13 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing over 450,000 patients. Studies employed rule-based methods (38%), machine learning (31%), deep learning (15%), topic modeling (8%), and semi-supervised learning (8%). Sensitivity ranged from 28.5% to 99.1%, with transformer models achieving the highest performance (AUROC 0.984). However, 61.5% of studies showed high risk of bias due to inadequate validation practices. Only one study conducted external validation, and none evaluated prospective implementation or patient outcomes. Critical reporting gaps included complete absence of fairness considerations, missing data handling procedures, and implementation guidance across all studies. While transformer-based models demonstrated superior performance, significant barriers remain before clinical deployment.

Identifiers

PMID41266514
PMCPMC12635077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.