ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi factor assessment of spatial accessibility for rural health equity in Diqing China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial accessibility analysis of vaccination units in Gansu Province, China (2025).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Bridging the rural logistics penalty: quantifying structural costs and designing policy mechanisms for home TCM delivery to older adults with chronic respiratory diseases.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timely access to essential primary healthcare services is critical for achieving health equity, particularly in geographically constrained mountainous regions where terrain imposes significant barriers to mobility. However, existing national planning standards in China rely on uniform service radii or walking-time thresholds, often failing to reflect the true accessibility conditions in complex highland environments. To address this gap, this study develops a Multi-Factor Integrated Mountain Walkability Model (MIMWM) that incorporates high-resolution Digital Elevation Models, slope-adjusted walking speeds, land-use resistance coefficients, and physiological walking capacity decline at altitude. Embedded within the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area framework, the model is applied to Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan Province, a high-altitude region characterized by rugged terrain and sparse healthcare infrastructure. Results demonstrate that traditional Euclidean and network-based methods substantially overestimate accessibility, particularly within the 15-60 min walking thresholds. The MIMWM reveals a critical threshold effect at approximately 30 min, beyond which accessibility improvements diminish. Moreover, most residents in the study area fall below the baseline criteria for access set by national healthcare standards, highlighting the inadequacy of uniform service thresholds in mountainous settings. This study underscores the dominant influence of terrain and walking capacity constraints and advocates for location-specific accessibility metrics and near-distance infrastructure investment to improve rural health equity. The model provides a replicable approach for integrating terrain sensitivity into healthcare accessibility planning in other topographically complex regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.