Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266500›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A scalable adaptive strategy for influence maximization in temporal social networks via vulture based meta heuristic.

Linian Liu, Binrong Huang, Shouliang Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linian LiuHanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea.
Binrong HuangCollege of Packaging Design and Art, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, 412000, Hunan, China.
Shouliang LaiCollege of Packaging Design and Art, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, 412000, Hunan, China. laishouliang@hut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, social networks have become vital forums for engagement, opinion formation, and information dissemination in areas such as marketing, policymaking, and public health. Identifying key individuals within these networks poses a considerable challenge, especially due to their dynamic nature and broad extent. This article introduces the Adaptive Dynamic Vulture Algorithm (ADVA) as a novel Meta-Heuristic method for improving influence in dynamic social networks. This methodology achieves an optimal balance between exploration and exploitation by prioritizing adaptation to temporal variations in networks and scalability, two aspects often neglected in previous studies. ADVA maintains its efficiency by adaptively adjusting the search methodology in response to changes in network design, such as edge density and node connectivity. The main challenge of this strategy is the computational complexity resulting from the handling of dynamic data. While pruning and indexing approaches alleviate this problem to a degree, they nonetheless result in longer execution times compared to certain alternative solutions. Evaluations on benchmark datasets, such as Stack Overflow and Wiki Talk, demonstrate that ADVA improves penetration by 15% on Stack Overflow and 20% on Wiki Talk compared to prior techniques, while maintaining scalability in large networks. This advantage is attributed to its adaptive techniques and multi-stage optimization; nonetheless, the extended execution time (e.g., 4800 s for a seed size of 60 on Stack Overflow) indicates a need for improvements in computing efficiency.

Indexed as

Dynamic social networksInfluence maximizationMeta-Heuristic optimizationScalabilityVulture adaptive algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41266500
PMCPMC12635302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.