ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated tumor stroma ratio assessment in colorectal cancer using hybrid deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Tumor-Stroma Ratio (TSR) is a critical prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC), offering insights into tumor microenvironment interactions. However, traditional TSR assessment methods are subjective and labor-intensive. This study is among the first approaches that introduce a novel integrative deep learning to leverage Transformer mechanisms for enhanced spatial context understanding in TSR assessment for CRC, addressing limitations in conventional CNN-only models and combining. Our methodology involves classifying patch images into normal and abnormal categories using a CNN-based model, then segmenting abnormal patches into tumor and stroma areas in whole-slide images (WSIs) through a hybrid CNN-Transformer UNET model. TSR is quantitatively assessed based on pixel area, providing a robust and objective measure of the tumor microenvironment. The classification model performed superiorly by achieving an overall classification accuracy of 93.53%, precision of 0.9040%, recall of 0.9644%, f1-score of 0.9332%, and Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.8724, sufficient to maintain consistent TSR evaluation in case of eventual misclassification. In segmentation tasks, the proposed Efficient-TransUNet model achieved the highest Aggregated Dice Coefficient (ADC) of 0.938 for stroma and 0.921 for tumor class, outperforming existing models. These results underscore the potential of this hybrid deep learning framework to enhance the precision of pathological evaluations and contribute to improved clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.