Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266458›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deciphering the role of Enterobacter cloacae as a green whole-cell biocatalyst for production of Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel.

S Vishnupriya, S Rahul, P Nithyanand, A Arumugam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S VishnupriyaBiofilm Biology Lab, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
S RahulAdvanced Biorefinery and Catalysis (ABC) Lab, Centre for Bioenergy, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
P NithyanandBiofilm Biology Lab, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. pnithyanand@gmail.com.
A ArumugamAdvanced Biorefinery and Catalysis (ABC) Lab, Centre for Bioenergy, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. aruchemxl13@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine bacteria are renowned for their resilience to extreme conditions such as variable temperatures and high salinity. Producing biodiesel through whole-cell biocatalysts derived from marine bacteria is an innovative and eco-friendly approach to biofuel production, leveraging the unique enzymatic abilities of microorganisms adapted to extreme marine environments. Their manufacturing costs and environmental footprint are significantly lowered as they involve fewer purification stages, function under gentler conditions, and generate less waste. Calophyllum inophyllum has been selected for this study because its high local abundance ensures a reliable and readily available biomass source, making it ideal for investigating its potential in biodiesel production. A marine lipolytic bacterial strain, BF2, with taxonomic identification as a salt-tolerant Enterobacter cloacae strain, has been evaluated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing results. The work involves experimenting with the novel ideation of a nutrient fortification method in the matrix, a loofah sponge, accompanied by the identification of the optimum conditions for transesterification of C. inophyllum oil. The immobilized enzyme converted the seed oil into biodiesel using transesterification. With a 6:1 ideal methanol-to-oil ratio, 30% (w/w) of catalyst, and 8% (w/w) of water content, the process produced a maximum conversion of 90.2% for fatty acid methyl ester. Performance and emissions analysis have been performed to compare the efficiency of the B10 and B20 blends with the commercial diesel. The results revealed that, under full load conditions, B10 decreased hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions by 18.33% and 14.01%, respectively, while B20 decreased hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions by 31.67% and 25.44%, respectively. Furthermore, with B10 and B20, smoke opacity declined by 0.29% and 1.76%, respectively. However, NO emission shows some rise; increases for B10 and B20 were 5.14% and 8.43%, respectively.

Indexed as

BiofuelsEnterobacter cloacaeBiocatalysisBiomassEsterificationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiofuelsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCalophyllum inophyllumFortificationLipolytic marine bacteriaSalt tolerantTransesterification

Identifiers

PMID41266458
PMCPMC12635284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.