Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Network analysis of empathy, anxiety and depression symptoms, relationship satisfaction, sensory processing sensitivity, and alexithymia.

Lukas Novak, Klara Malinakova, Kateřina Juklová, Josef Koláček, Radka Zidkova, Zdenek Meier, Peter Tavel, Jitse P van Dijk, Andrea F de Winter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lukas NovakOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. lukas.novak@oushi.upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7582-2098
Klara MalinakovaOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-1204
Kateřina JuklováDepartment of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-1703
Josef KoláčekOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Radka ZidkovaOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3144-2437
Zdenek MeierOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9810-6230
Peter TavelOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-001X
Jitse P van DijkOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0225-6811
Andrea F de WinterDepartment of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-4889

Funding

Czech Ministry of School and Education CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mood disorders, like anxiety and depression, are the most prevalent mental health issues that significantly impact both individuals and society. Thus, the exploration of risk and protective factors that may influence anxiety and depression symptoms is of great importance. Studies have shown that higher emotional empathy is often linked to increased anxiety and depression, yet results are mixed. Understanding this link in more depth may be relevant for psychotherapists, as it may help them in creating effective treatment plans for anxiety and depression. Therefore, this study aims to explore how positive and negative emotional empathy are linked with anxiety/depression symptoms once relationship satisfaction, sensory‑processing sensitivity (SPS), and alexithymia are taken into account. In 3 382 Czech adults (mean age = 31.76 ± 13.13; 66.29% Females), we administered the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ), Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS), Sensory‑Processing Sensitivity Questionnaire - SPSQ - (sensory subscale), and Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire - PAQ - (externally‑oriented‑thinking sub‑scale). Mixed Graphical Model networks were estimated for (a) total scores and (b) individual items, age, gender, and education were controlled. Accuracy and stability were explored via non‑parametric bootstrapping. At the total‑score level, higher emotional empathy was positively linked with anxiety and depression. Both links weakened after covariates were entered. Empathy nevertheless retained positive edges with SPS and relationship satisfaction, and a negative edge with alexithymia. In the item‑level network, no negative‑empathy items related to anxiety or depression. One positive‑empathy item ("When someone close to me is happy, it affects me deeply - in a positive way") showed an indirect association with lower anxiety via greater relationship satisfaction. Bootstrapping indicated acceptable stability for centrality indices but wide CIs for some edge weights. Our findings suggest that the link between emotional empathy and anxiety/depression is largely indirect. Positive empathy may buffer against anxiety via higher relationship satisfaction. Deconstructing these constructs to the item level may provide more specific insights than analyzing total scores alone. Future empathy researchers should also use longitudinal designs to examine potential causal relationships between empathy and anxiety/depression.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsAnxietyDepressionEmpathyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41266457
PMCPMC12635365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.