Intentional use and self-efficacy as distinct facets of impression management and their relationships with socio-motivational, cognitive, and mental health factors.

Human beings regularly adjust behaviors across social contexts as part of impression management (IM). Recently, "camouflaging" has been described as the behavioral strategies autistic individuals employ to blend into neurotypical social norms, often at costs to psychological wellbeing. It remains unclear whether camouflaging is unique to autism or overlaps with established IM constructs in terms of shared latent facets, socio-motivational and cognitive drivers, and mental health outcomes. To address this knowledge gap, we surveyed a representative US general population sample of 972 adults, utilizing self-report measures to assess camouflaging/IM, along with their theoretical socio-motivational and cognitive antecedents and mental health consequences. We first applied joint exploratory factor analysis to identify the latent facets underlying measures across camouflaging and existing IM constructs. Two latent IM facets emerged: "intentional use" (purposeful IM use) and "self-efficacy" (self-perceived IM capacity). Structural equation modeling suggested that greater IM intentional use was driven by socio-motivational pressures and predicted poorer mental health, whereas stronger IM self-efficacy was supported by executive functioning and perspective-taking and linked to better mental health. Neurodivergent traits exhibited unique moderation effects; in those with elevated autistic traits, greater IM intentional use and self-efficacy were both linked to poorer mental health. Yet, in those with elevated ADHD traits, greater IM self-efficacy was linked to better mental health. Critically, greater IM self-efficacy may buffer the negative impacts of IM intentional use on mental health. Our findings reveal an expanded understanding of camouflaging as part of multi-faceted IM, which exhibits complex relationships with mental health, moderated by neurodivergence. The implications point to conceptual and methodological advances for social coping research across neurodiverse groups, especially for developing tailored support.