Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266397›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2025

Timing of reward cues alters the interaction between reward and interest on memory over time.

Zhongyu Hu, Jiongjiong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhongyu HuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jiongjiong YangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. yangjj@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation jointly influence memory. While studies show that rewards diminish the effect of intrinsic motivation on memory, rewards usually precede intrinsic motivation, leaving a gap in understanding their interaction when rewards are presented afterward. So, this study investigated how the timing of reward cues moderated the interaction between reward and intrinsic motivation on memory over time. Participants viewed film clips, rated interest, and completed memory tests at different delays. Reward cues were presented either before or after each clip and rating. Results showed that when cued before clips, rewards improved memory and attenuated forgetting for low-interest clips, thereby decreasing the interest effect on memory. Conversely, when cued after clips, rewards improved memory and attenuated forgetting for high-interest clips, thereby increasing the interest effect. Both patterns emerged through time-dependent consolidation. These findings clarify how extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation interact across temporal dynamics to influence memory.

Identifiers

PMID41266397
PMCPMC12635356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.