Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266340›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Sea level rise and flooding of hazardous sites in marginalized communities across the United States.

Lara J Cushing, Yang Ju, Seigi Karasaki, Scott Kulp, Nicholas Depsky, Alique Berberian, Jessie Jaeger, Benjamin Strauss, Rachel Morello-Frosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara J CushingDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. lcushing@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-6450
Yang JuDepartment of Land Resources and Tourism, School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-7533
Seigi KarasakiEnergy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-3865
Scott KulpClimate Central, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Nicholas DepskyEnergy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Alique BerberianDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jessie JaegerSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1891-2633
Benjamin StraussClimate Central, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-6575
Rachel Morello-FroschSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. rmf@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-7287

Funding

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US Environmental Protection Agency) 84003901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea level rise (SLR) increases the risk of flooding at coastal sites that use and produce hazardous substances. We assess whether socially marginalized populations in the United States are more likely to be impacted by projected SLR-related flooding of hazardous sites that could result in contaminant releases. We identify 5500 facilities at risk of a 1-in-100-year flood event by 2100 under a scenario of continued high greenhouse gas emissions, including coastal power plants, sewage treatment facilities, fossil fuel infrastructure, industrial facilities, and formerly used defense sites. Seven states (Louisiana, Florida, New Jersey, Texas, California, New York, and Massachusetts) account for nearly 80% of projected at-risk facilities. Controlling for population density and county, a one standard deviation increase in the proportion of linguistically isolated households, neighborhood residents identifying as Hispanic, households with incomes below twice the federal poverty line, households without a vehicle, non-voters, and renters is associated with 19-41% higher likelihood of having a site at risk of SLR-related flooding within 1 kilometer (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.19 [1.09, 1.31], 1.22 [1.08, 1.37], 1.27 [1.16, 1.39], 1.35 [1.21-1.51], 1.36 [1.21, 1.53], and 1.41 [1.32, 1.52], respectively). Results elucidate the need for disaster planning, land-use decision-making, as well as mitigation strategies that address the inequitable hazards and potential health threats posed by SLR.

Indexed as

FloodsHazardous Waste SitesHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41266340
PMCPMC12635160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.