ArticleNature communications2025
Distinctive roles of left and right entorhinal cortex in path integration via a non-invasive stimulation study.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Modulation of cognitive and motor functions by temporal interference stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and variability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The entorhinal cortex (EC) is known to play important roles in spatial cognition of human behaviors. However, the functional contributions and the lateralization of EC are not well known. This paper proposed a new paradigm by employing non-invasive stimulation - Temporal interference (TI) - of human EC in left or right hemisphere under path integration (PI) tasks of sensory-driven and abstract processing. Five metrics were introduced to evaluate PI performance, with results revealing significant improvements after EC stimulation. Moreover, the left EC modulation achieved more enhanced performances of abstract processing, whereas the modulation of the right EC had better improvements in the sensory-driven condition. The results indicated that functional roles may differ in left and right EC under PI tasks. This study provided valuable insights into hemispheric specialization within EC and suggested potential pathways for developing early intervention strategies through the non-invasive modulation of EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.