Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266330›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Active learning-guided catalyst design for selective acetate production in CO electroreduction.

Yuting Xu, Hefei Li, Jiaqi Yang, Yilang Liu, Wanyu Deng, Ahryeon Lee, Feng Jiao, Fanglin Che

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Variations of Alloying Site Density in PdAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuting Xu *Department of Chemical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Hefei Li *Center for Carbon Management, Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-8809
Jiaqi YangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Yilang LiuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
Wanyu DengCenter for Carbon Management, Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ahryeon LeeCenter for Carbon Management, Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Feng JiaoCenter for Carbon Management, Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. jiaof@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-3203
Fanglin CheDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA. fche@wpi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5109-8296

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2537029National Science Foundation (NSF) EEC-2330245U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0024553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetic acid is an essential chemical with industrial and consumer relevance, and global demand is expected to reach 24.5 million tonnes by 2025. Electrochemical CO reduction reaction (CORR) over Cu offers a sustainable route to acetate from waste carbon, but identifying catalysts with high CO-to-acetate selectivity remains challenging due to limited mechanistic understanding. Here, we establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven multi-scale simulation framework integrating grand-canonical density functional theory (GC-DFT), microkinetic modeling (MKM), and active learning to elucidate the CORR mechanism and guide catalyst discovery. The DFT-based MKM reveals that acetate forms via CO-CH coupling, with CH* binding energy identified as the key descriptor governing selectivity of acetate production from CORR. Active learning optimization predicts Cu/Pd (2:1) and Cu/Ag (3:1) as the most selective catalysts. Zero-gap electrolyzer experiments confirm their effective performance, achieving acetate Faradaic efficiencies of 50% and 47%, respectively, compared to 21% for pure Cu. This study demonstrates a data-driven catalyst design strategy for advancing selective electrocatalysis.

Identifiers

PMID41266330
PMCPMC12748942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.