Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266296›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Observing network dynamics through sentinel nodes.

Neil G MacLaren, Baruch Barzel, Naoki Masuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neil G MacLarenDepartment of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260-2900, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8478-8530
Baruch BarzelDepartment of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-4384
Naoki MasudaDepartment of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260-2900, USA. naokimas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-801X

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 21H04595MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 23H03414MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 24K14840National Science Foundation (NSF) 2052720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental premise of statistical physics is that the particles in a physical system are interchangeable, and hence the state of each specific component is representative of the system as a whole. This assumption breaks down for complex networks, in which nodes may be extremely diverse, and no single component can truly represent the state of the entire system. It seems, therefore, that to observe the dynamics of social, biological or technological networks, one must extract the dynamic states of a large number of nodes-a task that is often practically prohibitive. Theoretical tools are also highly restrictive, given the analytically impenetrable combination of complex heterogeneous networks with nonlinear, often hidden, dynamics. To overcome this challenge, we use machine learning techniques to detect the network's sentinel nodes, a set of network components whose combined states can help approximate the average dynamics of the entire network. The method allows us to assess the equilibrium state of a large complex system by tracking just a small number of carefully selected nodes. We find that the sentinels are mainly determined by the network structure such that they can be extracted even with little knowledge of the system's specific interaction dynamics. Therefore, the network's sentinels offer a natural probe by which to observe the system's dynamic states. Intriguingly, sentinels tend to avoid the highly central nodes such as the hubs.

Identifiers

PMID41266296
PMCPMC12635286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.