ArticleeNeuro2025
Novelty Influences Dopamine Responses to Conditioned and Unconditioned Aversive Stimuli over Extended Temporal Windows.
Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dopamine Response to Unexpected Aversive Outcomes Drives the Return of Extinguished Fear.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens is classically linked to associative learning, signaling relationships between predictive cues and outcomes. Yet, dopamine is also strongly modulated by novelty, a nonassociative factor that has received comparatively little attention. Here, we used optical dopamine sensors in awake, behaving male and female mice to define how novelty alters the temporal dynamics of dopamine release during aversive learning. We manipulated novelty in three ways: (1) omitting expected footshocks, (2) introducing novel neutral cues concurrently with shock-predictive stimuli, and (3) presenting novel stimuli in an unpaired fashion within a context. Across all conditions, manipulations robustly increased dopamine release and in some cases altered the directionality of cue-evoked dopamine responses. Notably, these effects extended beyond the immediate stimulus window, altering subsequent responses to both conditioned cues and footshocks. Together, these findings demonstrate that changes in the environment that extend beyond prediction-based learning can exert a powerful and sustained influence on dopamine signaling, reshaping how aversive cues and outcomes are represented in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.