ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2025
Association between maternal occupation as a cleaner/maid/janitor during early pregnancy and selected birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCleaning work involves potential exposures to physical, chemical, biological and psychosocial hazards, which might increase the risk of birth defects. Yet, there is limited research focused on maternal occupation in cleaning jobs and the risk of birth defects. We investigated the association between maternal occupation in cleaning-related jobs during early pregnancy and selected birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a case-control study from 1997 to 2011.
methodsMothers self-reported job details, which were classified by occupational epidemiologists into cleaner or non-cleaner occupations. Cases were live births or stillbirths with at least one of 19 eligible birth defects ascertained from state surveillance systems, while controls were randomly selected live births without structural defects. We estimated adjusted ORs with 95% CIs from multivariable logistic regression for associations between maternal cleaning occupations and birth defects, controlling for eight covariates identified a priori.
resultsOf the 28 936 mothers, 1109 (868 cases/241 controls) were assigned a primary occupational code as a cleaner during early pregnancy. In total, 9 of the 19 included birth defects had elevated ORs (>1.5), ranging from 1.58 for anophthalmia/microphthalmia to 2.65 for oesophageal atresia/stenosis; six had CIs that excluded the null (anencephaly, glaucoma, anotia/microtia, cleft lip and palate, oesophageal atresia/stenosis, small intestinal atresia/stenosis).
conclusionsWe observed that maternal occupation in cleaning-related jobs was associated with several specific birth defects in various body systems. Future studies should explore specific chemical and physical exposures under these cleaning occupations and the association with birth defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.