Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266114›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics2026

Germline genomic testing to assess the suitability of stem cell donors in the treatment of haematological malignancy: clinical ethics commentary.

Helena Carley, Kate Sahan, Helen Hanson, Katie Snape, Sarah Westbury, Michael J Parker, Anneke M Lucassen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helena CarleySouth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Kate SahanThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK kate.sahan@ethox.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-5581
Helen HansonPeninsula Regional Genetics Service, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Katie SnapeSouth West Thames Centre for Genomics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sarah WestburyTranslational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Michael J ParkerThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4711
Anneke M LucassenUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-4338

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing integration of genomic medicine into routine medical care brings to light issues of complexity and uncertainty in the interpretation of genetic variation.We describe a fictional case study based on our experiences in the haematological malignancy setting to illustrate the complexities in using genomic testing to evaluate the suitability of relatives to act as stem cell donors. In particular, we demonstrate the ethical issues arising following the identification of a germline variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in a gene associated with inherited cancer susceptibility in a potential recipient. We discuss the factors that need to be considered, such as how this might influence donor selection, the potential for donor-derived leukaemia and the issues of offering testing to other family members.Popular discourse suggests genomics can offer clarity and transformation in healthcare. This case highlights the ethically complex nature of decision-making in genetic medicine due to the familial aspects of genomic information, the uncertain nature of many genomic results and how changes in the use of genomic information in clinical practice can call for urgent decision-making. This highlights the need for increased interdisciplinary working which takes into account the factors driving decisions for each specialty and recommends access to independent ethics support for members of the multidisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHematologic NeoplasmsTissue DonorsDecision MakingEthical DilemmasFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansEthicsEthics- Medical

Identifiers

PMID41266114
PMCPMC7619150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.