ArticleMethods in enzymology2025
Unsupervised learning of collective variables for conformational sampling of cyclic peptides.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- StrEAMM-Thioether: Efficient Structure Prediction for Thioether-Linked Cyclic Peptides.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While many approaches exist for machine learning (ML) collective variables (CVs) using supervised learning techniques, unsupervised methods for CV discovery remain limited. However, these unsupervised approaches are particularly important for systems with numerous metastable states, where labeling conformations is impractical or ambiguous. Developing such methods is also challenging, especially when aiming to connect a large number, sometimes hundreds, of metastable states. In this study, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoders to derive CVs and evaluated their performance across cyclic peptides of varying sizes. For cyclic pentapeptides, ML-based CVs performed comparably to the conventional CVs proposed by McHugh et al. However, their effectiveness declined as peptide size increased, likely due to the increasing complexity of the conformational transition pathways. These findings highlight the growing need for the development of more efficient and robust unsupervised ML methods for CV construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.