Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266028›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2025

Unsupervised learning of collective variables for conformational sampling of cyclic peptides.

Jiayuan Miao, Yu-Shan Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiayuan MiaoDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Yu-Shan LinDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States. Electronic address: yu-shan.lin@tufts.edu.

Funding

Understanding and Designing Cyclic PeptidesR01GM124160 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI Yu-Shan Lin · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many approaches exist for machine learning (ML) collective variables (CVs) using supervised learning techniques, unsupervised methods for CV discovery remain limited. However, these unsupervised approaches are particularly important for systems with numerous metastable states, where labeling conformations is impractical or ambiguous. Developing such methods is also challenging, especially when aiming to connect a large number, sometimes hundreds, of metastable states. In this study, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoders to derive CVs and evaluated their performance across cyclic peptides of varying sizes. For cyclic pentapeptides, ML-based CVs performed comparably to the conventional CVs proposed by McHugh et al. However, their effectiveness declined as peptide size increased, likely due to the increasing complexity of the conformational transition pathways. These findings highlight the growing need for the development of more efficient and robust unsupervised ML methods for CV construction.

Indexed as

Peptides, CyclicUnsupervised Machine LearningPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein ConformationPeptides, CyclicCollective variableCyclic peptidesEnhanced conformational samplingMachine learningMolecular dynamics simulation

Identifiers

PMID41266028
PMCPMC13242681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.