ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2026
Disparity in Changes of Post-Acute Care Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine changes in access to post-acute care (PAC) across rehabilitation service areas (RSAs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to assess the effects of rurality, race/ethnicity, and dual eligibility on such changes.
designRetrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING AND
participantsMedicare records for 736,663 beneficiaries aged ≥66 years hospitalized for stroke, hip fracture, or joint replacement from 2018 to 2021 linked to 1711 RSAs.
methodsMultilevel generalized linear mixed models estimated PAC use, adjusting for patient and geographic factors. We examined interactions between the pandemic period (2018-2019 vs 2020-2021) and rurality, race/ethnicity, and dual eligibility for each diagnosis.
resultsAs expected, PAC use declined during COVID-19 across all conditions. Minority [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93, P < .001] and dual-eligible (OR = 0.96, P = .003) stroke survivors had reduced PAC use during the pandemic. Dual-eligible patients with hip fractures had significantly decreased PAC use (OR = 0.84, P < .001). Unexpectedly, rural joint replacement patients showed increased PAC use (large rural OR = 1.08, P < .001; small town/rural OR = 1.05, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We found variations of PAC use across conditions during the pandemic. Fewer stroke and hip fracture survivors-particularly those who were dual-eligible-received needed rehabilitation services, underscoring a gap in access during this critical period. In contrast, rural patients with joint replacements demonstrated increased PAC use during the pandemic. These findings highlight the importance of developing postpandemic policies that safeguard access to rehabilitation for traditionally vulnerable populations, such as dual-eligible patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.