Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41265476›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2026

HS-FET-GC/MS-Method Development and Validation for Analysis of 45 Terpenes-Creating a Complementary Tool for Comprehensive Profiling of Cannabis Flowers in Forensics.

Marica Hundertmark, Tanja Germerott, Cora Wunder

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marica HundertmarkDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7261-6628
Tanja GermerottDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Cora WunderDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-268X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis sativa is one of the oldest and most versatile plants with many facets ranging from intoxicant to medicine. Legalisation of medicinal cannabis leads to an increasing complexity of specific forensic questions to distinguish between recreational and medicinal use, for example, in context with participation in road traffic. Hence, there is a recent interest in finding objective markers that enable the differentiability of cannabis flowers. Terpenes, volatile hydrocarbons with a modular construction principle of isoprene subunits, are currently suggested as a second substance class alongside phytocannabinoids for the classification of cannabis material. A headspace full evaporation technique gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-FET-GC/MS) methodology was successfully validated according to forensic guidelines for the analysis of 45 terpenes in cannabis flowers including 16 monoterpenes, 16 monoterpenoids, 7 sesquiterpenes and 6 sesquiterpenoids. FET-sampling was developed in detail experimentally, revealing evidence of thermal instability of higher-boiling terpenes. Validation included selectivity, linearity of calibration (ranges 10-2000 μg/g), analytical limits (at least 6 μg/g), accuracy (bias) as well as intraday and interday precision. The use of a retention time index mixture as an internal standard and measurement in SIM-scan mode also allows for the qualitative identification of further terpenes present in cannabis. Application to a set of cannabis strains with similar Δ

Indexed as

CannabisFlowersGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryTerpenesLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsTerpenescannabisforensic toxicologyfull evaporation techniquestrainsterpenes

Identifiers

PMID41265476
PMCPMC12796564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.