ArticleCell reports. Medicine2025
Precision prediction of venetoclax-azacitidine treatment efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia via integrative drug screening and machine learning.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- A Nomogram Prediction Model and Scoring System for Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Venetoclax Combined with Hypomethylating Agents.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venetoclax-azacitidine (VEN/AZA) has transformed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy, yet reliable predictors of response remain lacking. We employ a multidisciplinary strategy combining ex vivo drug sensitivity testing, transcriptomic profiling, functional assays, and clinical data to identify determinants of VEN/AZA response. Core genes consistently associated with responsiveness are validated through CRISPR-Cas9 screening, with silencing of BCL2L1 and PINK1 preferentially enhancing drug sensitivity. Building on these insights, we develop and validate an eight-gene random forest model (RF8) that achieves high accuracy across four independent cohorts (n = 498). RF8 distills the downstream effects of genetic alterations to assist in predicting treatment response and outperforms existing genetic mutation-based signatures. Moreover, RF8 scores show a nearly monotonic relationship with clinical response probabilities and survival outcomes, enabling precise patient stratification. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating transcriptomic and drug-response data to guide VEN/AZA therapy, representing an advance toward personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.