ArticleEnvironmental analysis, health and toxicology2025
Assessing inhalation intake of microplastics using MPPD model.
Article in Environmental analysis, health and toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concentration-dependent aerosol size alters regional deposition and inhalation dose translation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Four Decades of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing evidence of the presence of small microplastics in human tissues necessitates research on their intake routes and internalization. Among two major routes of exposure to microplastics (MPs), inhalation pathways are less investigated than ingestion pathways. In this study, quantitative estimation of microplastics intake and internalization was conducted using the multi-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model by US Environmental Protection Agency assuming three representative particle size distributions (i.e., Power law, unimodal, and biomodal distributions) of cylindrical MPs within the aerodynamic diameter between 0.1 and 10 μm at the aspect ratio of 3:1. Assuming the default atmospheric concentration of MPs at 0.1 μg m-3, the estimated mass deposition in human lungs ranged 19.1-49.9 μg. Although sensitivity analysis revealed that estimated mass deposition of MPs in human lungs were not much different among three particle size distributions, deposition in the pulmonary region was strongly affected by the type of size distributions. Because of suspected health symptoms of MPs in the pulmonary region and the slower clearance in this region, it is of urgent needs to characterize MP size distribution in the inhalable particle size range (0.1-10 μm) and to analyze MPs in the same size range in human respiratory tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.