Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264951›Full record

ArticleForensic science international2026

Lessons from the "Trial of the Century" and early forensic science efforts: Beginnings of U.S. forensic science and the little-known role of the National Bureau of Standards.

John M Butler

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John M ButlerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, USA. Electronic address: john.butler@nist.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article briefly discusses early pioneers in Europe and the United States involved in forensic science (also known then as criminalistics or police science), as well as a 1929 European tour by Calvin Goddard that would link efforts and raise awareness of activities on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. High profile crimes often propel disciplines in forensic science to make significant progress. The first so-called "Crime of the Century" involved kidnapping the 20-month-old son of famous aviator Charles Lindbergh from his second-story nursery on the evening of March 1, 1932. This set in motion a large investigation that would lead to the "Trial of the Century" almost three years later. Forensic science evidence in the form of handwriting comparisons with 15 ransom notes and analysis of a ladder left at the crime scene would play key roles in the conviction of Bruno Richard Hauptmann. Widespread media attention and publicly available records, some which have only recently come to light, provide opportunities to consider how this investigation and trial contributed to the development and foundations of early forensic science in the United States. Lessons from the study of early forensic science efforts can benefit this field today. In particular, the little-known roles of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) and a physicist named Wilmer Souder in the Lindbergh baby kidnapping case. Today, almost a century later, NBS, now known as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), continues to make important advances in forensic science research, standards, and scientific foundation studies.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesEuropeHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansUnited StatesCalvin GoddardForensic scienceHauptmann trialHistoryLindbergh baby kidnapping investigationNational Bureau of StandardsNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyWilmer Souder

Identifiers

PMID41264951
PMCPMC12826536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.