Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264796›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2025

Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm.

Nicole Lubasinski, Hood Thabit, Paul W Nutter, David Petrescu, Simon Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole LubasinskiDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, +44(0)1613069280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-8258
Hood ThabitDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, +44(0)1613069280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-6997
Paul W NutterDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, +44(0)1613069280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-861X
David PetrescuDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, +44(0)1613069280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-7265
Simon HarperDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, +44(0)1613069280.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-5049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires maintaining target blood glucose levels through precise diet and insulin dosing. Predicting postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) based solely on carbohydrate content is limited by factors such as meal composition, individual physiology, and lifestyle. Continuous glucose monitors provide insights into these responses, revealing significant individual variability. The statistical clustering method proposed here balances the number of clusters formed and the glycemic variability of the PPGRs within each cluster to offer a clustering technique on which treatment decisions could be based. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate a PPGR clustering method that identifies reproducible meal-specific glucose patterns in people with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Blood glucose data from the OhioT1DM dataset were used to assess clustering of PPGR based on the coefficient of variability (CV) of glucose. Clustering was performed using statistical clustering, with each PPGR isolated into 48 data points per event. A CV threshold of <36% was used to define clinically similar clusters. This aimed to cluster PPGRs with minimal glycemic variability. The approach aims to enhance precision in analyzing postprandial glycemic dynamics, assessing cluster cohesion via standard deviation and CV within meal categories. Results: The analysis revealed a reproducible set of PPGR clusters specific to meal types and individuals (mean [SD], 2.4 [1.8] for breakfast, 2.7 [0.9] for lunch, and 3.1 [1.0] for dinner), with the number of clusters varying across participants and meals in the dataset. Carbohydrate intake alone did not affect cluster formation, suggesting a complex relationship between meal composition and PPGR variability. However, certain individuals showed significant associations between carbohydrate intake and cluster formation for specific meals. Conclusions: The meal-based glycemic clustering algorithm provides a promising framework for predicting PPGRs in people with type 1 diabetes, independent of carbohydrate intake. It emphasizes the need for personalized prediction models to optimize time in range and enhance diabetes management. Efforts to refine treatment strategies are crucial in reducing T1D-related complications.

Indexed as

bolus targeting solutionmeal-based PPGR clustering algorithmpostprandial glycemic response (PPGRs)PPGR clustersreproducibilitytype 1 diabetes (T1D)

Identifiers

PMID41264796
PMCPMC12633838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.