ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Caretakers at the core: exploring worker perceptions of job satisfaction, training, cattlecare, and workplace community on feedyards in the United States.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The U.S. cattle feeding sector employs an important proportion of the agricultural workforce and is critical for meeting consumer expectations regarding how beef cattle are raised and cared for. Although extensive research has examined animal health, productivity, and performance in feedlots, the attitudes and perspectives of feedlot employees, who provide essential daily cattle care, have received limited attention. This study aimed to explore feedlot workers' attitudes regarding job satisfaction, training, animal care, and workplace community using a mixed-methods approach. Feedlot workers (n = 329) from 29 feedlots nationwide participated in 95 focus group or interview discussions and completed a written survey. Survey responses indicated high levels of job satisfaction and pride in employees' roles related to cattle care and welfare. Analysis revealed that employee agreement with key job satisfaction and cattle care statements was often associated with preferred language and age. Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts identified 13 primary themes: (1) Animal Health and Veterinary Care, (2) Stockmanship and Stewardship, (3) Continuous Improvement, (4) External Relations, (5) Safety, (6) Internal Communication, (7) Personal Backgrounds and Experiences, (8) Physical Environment, (9) Opportunities for Good Welfare and Positive Experiences, (10) Purpose and Role in Cattle Feeding, (11) Relationships, (12) Resources, and (13) Finance. Employees expressed a strong commitment to animal welfare and highlighted the importance of continuous improvement through ongoing training and hands-on learning opportunities. However, they also identified persistent challenges, including communication barriers, labor availability, equipment functionality, and extreme environmental conditions. Results from the logistic regression analysis of demographic factors suggest that language and age may influence employee experiences and perceptions within the feedyard environment. Addressing these challenges through targeted training improvements and supportive resources could significantly enhance both employee well-being and animal welfare. This research provides critical insights for incorporating workforce perspectives into comprehensive sustainability initiatives within the beef cattle industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.