Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264651›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Real-time forecasting of data revisions in epidemic surveillance streams.

Jingjing Tang, Aaron Rumack, Bryan Wilder, Roni Rosenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingjing TangComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-5018
Aaron RumackMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Bryan WilderMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Roni RosenfeldMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-5862

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemic data streams undergo frequent revisions due to reporting delays ("backfill") and other factors. Relying on tentative surveillance values can seriously degrade the quality of situational awareness, forecasting accuracy and decision-making. We introduce Delphi Revision Forecast (Delphi-RF), a real-time data revision forecasting framework using nonparametric quantile regression, applicable to both counts and proportions (fractions) in public health reporting. By incorporating all available revisions up to a given estimation date, Delphi-RF models revision dynamics and generates distributional forecasts of finalized surveillance values. Applied to daily COVID-19 data (insurance claims, antigen tests, confirmed cases) and weekly dengue and influenza-like illness (ILI) case counts, Delphi-RF delivers accurate revision forecasts, particularly in early reporting stages. In addition, it improves computational efficiency by more than 10-100x compared to existing methods, making it a scalable solution for real-time public health surveillance.

Indexed as

EpidemicsPublic Health SurveillanceComputational BiologyCOVID-19DengueForecastingHumansInfluenza, HumanSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41264651
PMCPMC12646461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.